The devastating Muzaffarabad earthquake of 8 October 2005: New insights into Himalayan seismicity and tectonics

Gondwana Research

Volume 9, Issue 4, June 2006, Pages 365–378

Gondwana Research 9 (2006) 365–378

GR Focus

The devastating Muzaffarabad earthquake of 8 October 2005: New insights
into Himalayan seismicity and tectonics

N. Purnachandra Rao a,⁎, P. Kumar a, Kalpna a, T. Tsukuda b, D.S. Ramesh a,b

a National Geophysical Research Institute, Uppal Road, Hyderabad 500007, India
b Earthquake Research Institute, University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113, Japan

Received 26 November 2005; accepted 23 January 2006
Available online 20 March 2006

Abstract
The recent earthquake of 8 October 2005 in the Muzaffarabad region in western Himalaya destroyed several parts of Pakistan and the north
Indian state of Jammu and Kashmir. The earthquake of magnitude 7.6 claimed more than 80,000 lives, clearly exposing the poor standards of
building construction — a major challenge facing the highly populated, earthquake prone, third world nations today. In this paper, we examine
variations in the stress field, seismicity patterns, seismic source character, tectonic setting, plate motion velocities, GPS results, and the
geodynamic factors relating to the geometry of the underlying subsurface structure and its role in generation of very large earthquakes. Focal
mechanism solutions of the Muzaffarabad earthquake and its aftershocks are found to have steep dip angles comparable to the Indian intra-plate
shield earthquakes rather than the typical Himalayan earthquakes that are characterized by shallow angle northward dips. A low p-value of 0.9 is
obtained for this earthquake from the decay pattern of 110 aftershocks, which is comparable to that of the 1993 Latur earthquake in the Indian
shield — the deadliest Stable Continental Region (SCR) earthquake till date. Inversion of focal mechanisms of the Harvard CMT catalogue
indicates distinct stress patterns in the Muzaffarabad region, seemingly governed by an overturned Himalayan thrust belt configuration that
envelops this region, adjoined by the Pamir and Hindukush regions. Recent developments in application of seismological tools like the receiver
function technique have enabled accurate mapping of the dipping trends of the Moho and Lithosphere–Asthenosphere Boundary (LAB) of Indian
lithosphere beneath southern Tibet. These have significantly improved our understanding of the collision process, the mechanism of Himalayan
orogeny and uplift of the Tibetan plateau, besides providing vital constraints on the seismic hazard threat posed by the Himalaya. New ideas have
also emerged through GPS, macroseismic investigations, paleoseismology and numerical modeling approaches. While many researchers suggest
that the Himalayan front is already overdue for several 8.0 magnitude earthquakes, some opine that most of the front may not really be capable of
sustaining the stress accumulation required for generation of great earthquakes. We propose that the occurrence of great earthquakes like those of
1897 in Shillong and 1950 in Assam have a strong correlation with their proximity to multiple plate junctions conducive for enormous stress build
up, like the eastern Himalayan syntaxis comprising the junction of the India, Eurasia plates, and the Burma, Sunda micro-plates.

Keywords: Great earthquakes; Himalaya; Indian plate; Muzaffarabad earthquake; Seismic hazard; Stress inversion

ScienceDirect
doi 10.1016/j.gr.2006.01.004

Free fulltext PDF

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s